Re: Very Serious Flaws With Proposed Guidelines

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Herp Law Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Dave Beamer on November 09, 1998 at 23:25:16:

In Reply to: Re: Very Serious Flaws With Proposed Guidelines posted by RP on November 09, 1998 at 22:37:56:

I am glad to hear that there is much e-mail traffic regarding these issues. I find it encouraging that so many people are spending time working on this matter. I seem to have missed the addressing of the subspecies so if you wouldn't mind repeating it for me I would be thankful. I understand that the endangered section can be modified on a state by state basis but I don't think these proposals will make a very positive impression if even limited collection of endangered species is requested. There will be absolutely no support for this from conservation biologists.
Dave Beamer

Follow Ups:

The Need for Subspecies RP 11/10/98 (24)
- Re: The Need for Subspecies Dave Beamer 11/10/98 (23)
  - Re: The Need for Subspecies RP 11/10/98 (22)
    - Re: The Need for Subspecies Dave Beamer 11/10/98 (21)
      - Re: The Need for Subspecies RP 11/11/98 (20)
        
        Re: The Need for Subspecies Dave Beamer 11/11/98 (19)
        
        Re: The Need for Subspecies arguement for Dave 11/15/98 (10)
        
        Re: The Need for Subspecies Man from Lake Titikaka 3/05/99 (0)
        
        Re: The Need for Subspecies Dave Beamer 11/16/98 (8)
        
        Re: The Need for Subspecies Opinion 11/16/98 (0)
        
        Re: The Need for Subspecies ok, how about this 11/16/98 (6)
        
        Re: The Need to Step Back and Regroup Jwemes 11/16/98 (0)
        
        Re: The Need for Subspecies Dave Beamer 11/16/98 (4)
        
        Subspecies Dave Russ 01/19/00 (0)
        
        Re: The Need for Subspecies answer 11/16/98 (2)
        
        Re: The Need for Subspecies Dave Beamer 11/16/98 (1)
        
        Re: The Need for Subspecies Mike 11/16/98 (0)
        
        Re: The Need for Grammar Dave Burge 11/12/98 (0)
        
        cut and paste, dave El Gringo Viejo 11/11/98 (6)
        
        Re: cut and paste, dave Flora Bennett. 4/23/99 (1)
        
        Re: cut and paste, dave Jewell-39@webtv.net 10/31/99 (0)
        
        Re: cut and paste, dave evelynday 4/12/99 (0)
        
        Re: cut and paste, dave Starbuck 3/21/99 (2)
        
        Re: cut and paste, dave Linda 4/28/99 (0)
        
        Re: cut and paste, dave Pat 3/25/99 (0)
Re: Very Serious Flaws With Proposed Guidelines Ric Blair 11/10/98 (2)
- Re: Very Serious Flaws With Proposed Guidelines Fed up 11/15/98 (0)
- Re: Very Serious Flaws With Proposed Guidelines Dave Beamer 11/10/98 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: I am glad to hear that there is much e-mail traffic regarding these issues. I find it encouraging that so many people are spending time working on this matter. I seem to have missed the addressing of the subspecies so if you wouldn't mind repeating it for me I would be thankful. I understand that the endangered section can be modified on a state by state basis but I don't think these proposals will make a very positive impression if even limited collection of endangered species is requested. There will be absolutely no support for this from conservation biologists. : Dave Beamer

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Herp Law Forum ] [ FAQ ]

KINGSNAKE.COM

Enjoy all our content free of charge with a user account that gives you full access to every feature. For added visibility, paid options are available - post in our Classifieds, showcase your business with Banner Ads or a Directory listing, promote reptile events, and more.

Re: Very Serious Flaws With Proposed Guidelines

KINGSNAKE.COM

Quick Links

Community

Legal & Safety

Support