![]() | market - home |
![]() |
![]() |
News & Events:
|
Posted by answer on November 16, 1998 at 14:47:05:
In Reply to: Re: The Need for Subspecies posted by Dave Beamer on November 16, 1998 at 14:14:26:
:
A subspecies tells you something about the animal.
If someone gives you a painted turtle with a pure yellow plastron and a dark red stripe down the middle of the carapace, that tells you that this animal is from the southern Mississippi Watershed(Tennesse, Mississippi, Arkansas, etc.) Naming subspecies for MAJOR, OBVOIUS differences is very helpful in letting you know the general geographic region it is from. Another example is Lampropeltis getelus floridana and Lampropeltis getelus california. These animals are far, far, far from each other and exhibit many different habitat partitions as well as phenotypic differences. believe this is another good subspecies. What would you call a Terrapene carolina carolina x Terrapene ornataa ornata. These occur in the wild, quite commonly in some areas. The species concept could be shredded just like the subspecies concept can. The reason that so many people want to keep these taxonomic levels in existence is because it helps to know the approximate geographic origin and an obvious difference in appearence between major populations.
MarginataXDorsalis? Sounds like some pretty silly clinal variation to me. Why not continue and give taxonomic status to every variation not matter how uninformative. If you are truly interested in taxonomy read the citations I posted earlier.
: Dave Beamer
Subject:
Comments:
Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
|
|
|
|