Re: The Need for Subspecies

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Herp Law Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Mike on November 16, 1998 at 16:19:00:

In Reply to: Re: The Need for Subspecies posted by Dave Beamer on November 16, 1998 at 15:13:27:

: Saying this is xxx species from xxx physiographic province also works just as well and doesn't require one to leap to unwarranted assumptions.
: Dave Beamer

Hey everyone. What Dave is saying is that there is no need for subspecies. So now all of you can breed your E. Box Turtles to your Three-toed Box Turtles, E.Kings to Cal. Kings, E. Milk to Mex. Milk, Pine snake to Bull snake and you can consider them pure bred animals. LOL... And if your lucky and they do start to recognize only by species and you have a lepidus taken from you because klauberi is protected in your state we'll see just how much sense it makes to do away with subspecies identification then. It's rediculous and unprofessional statement's like these that hurt the whole herp community and will eventually lead to the demise of herpetoculture as we know it. It's people like YOU DAVE that have no place in the herp community. I've sat back for weeks now reading this forum and tried to figure out what the heck you want from these people in here. If it's to say that your right and they're wrong you've failed. Well if it's fame that you seek by posting here so much i can assure you that you've had your ten minutes so to speek. But thats about all. And i here your specialty is with salamanders. Why haven't you ever posted in the salamander forum. If it is indeed your specialty don't you think you would be more valuable there? Or is helping the people who post questions there because they need help not important. There are a lot of future herpers there in need of advise. Because we don't need any here. Mike

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: : : Saying this is xxx species from xxx physiographic province also works just as well and doesn't require one to leap to unwarranted assumptions. : : Dave Beamer : : Hey everyone. What Dave is saying is that there is no need for subspecies. So now all of you can breed your E. Box Turtles to your Three-toed Box Turtles, E.Kings to Cal. Kings, E. Milk to Mex. Milk, Pine snake to Bull snake and you can consider them pure bred animals. LOL... And if your lucky and they do start to recognize only by species and you have a lepidus taken from you because klauberi is protected in your state we'll see just how much sense it makes to do away with subspecies identification then. It's rediculous and unprofessional statement's like these that hurt the whole herp community and will eventually lead to the demise of herpetoculture as we know it. It's people like YOU DAVE that have no place in the herp community. I've sat back for weeks now reading this forum and tried to figure out what the heck you want from these people in here. If it's to say that your right and they're wrong you've failed. Well if it's fame that you seek by posting here so much i can assure you that you've had your ten minutes so to speek. But thats about all. And i here your specialty is with salamanders. Why haven't you ever posted in the salamander forum. If it is indeed your specialty don't you think you would be more valuable there? Or is helping the people who post questions there because they need help not important. There are a lot of future herpers there in need of advise. Because we don't need any here. Mike

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Herp Law Forum ] [ FAQ ]

KINGSNAKE.COM

Enjoy all our content free of charge with a user account that gives you full access to every feature. For added visibility, paid options are available - post in our Classifieds, showcase your business with Banner Ads or a Directory listing, promote reptile events, and more.

Re: The Need for Subspecies

KINGSNAKE.COM

Quick Links

Community

Legal & Safety

Support