kingsnake.com - reptile and amphibian classifieds, breeders, forums, photos, videos and more

return to main index

  mobile - desktop
follow us on facebook follow us on twitter follow us on YouTube link to us on LinkedIn
International Reptile Conservation Foundation  
click here for Rodent Pro
This Space Available
3 months for $50.00
Locate a business by name: click to list your business
search the classifieds. buy an account
events by zip code list an event
Search the forums             Search in:
News & Events: Herp Photo of the Day: Happy Rattlesnake Friday! . . . . . . . . . .  Herp Photo of the Day: Milk Snake . . . . . . . . . .  Southwestern Herp Society Meeting - July 05, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  St. Louis Herpetological Society - July 13, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  San Diego Herp Society Meeting - July 15, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Colorado Herp Society Meeting - July 19, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Chicago Herpetological Society Meeting - July 20, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Bay Area Herpetological Society Meeting - July 25, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Suncoast Herp Society Meeting - July 26, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  DFW Herp Society Meeting - July 26, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Tucson Herpetological Society Meeting - July 28, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Southwestern Herp Society Meeting - Aug 02, 2025 . . . . . . . . . . 

Taxonomy is a matter of evidence...


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Taxonomy Forum ]

Posted by WW on October 15, 2002 at 14:22:54:

In Reply to: posted by troy h on October 15, 2002 at 09:20:26:

Basically, in order to evaluate a new taxonomic proposal, it is a good idea to compare the evidence on which both the new proposal and the status quo are based. In a surprising number of cases, the status quo is primarily the result of inertia, not positive evidence. In such cases, the new proposal is likely to become accepted rapidly.

Sure, the new proposal is a hypothesis, and as for all hypotheses, it is always possible that someone will sooner or later find new and stronger evidence to contradict that hypothesis. However, how long do we wait for someone else to look again? Although herp systematics may seem a crowded field at times, the fact is that todays revision of a taxon may be the last for another 20 or 30 years. We can only go by what we know now.

Obviously, there are also cases where new "standardised lists" introduce novelties by themselves, without new evidence, in which case adherence to them should be considered optional at best.

Cheers,

Wolfgang



Follow Ups:




[ Follow Ups ] [ The Taxonomy Forum ]