 | mobile - desktop |
|
| mobile - desktop |
|
 |
 Contact Sales! |
News & Events:
|
Posted by WK on December 30, 2002 at 18:31:59:
In Reply to: LOL! posted by BGF on December 30, 2002 at 04:57:43:
Raymond doctored one of our figures but presented it in his webpost without mentioning the changing.
Hey, now that is downright naughty. ;^)
Just to be clear, I wasn’t implying that RH has a valid gripe here. It just seems to me that he expends quite a bit of energy going after you and WW on the Kingsnake forums. I was just suggesting he send a letter to the journal detailing his concerns instead of posting them here. Then you could rebut, and he could re-rebutt, and so on The debate would thereby be viewed and commented upon by knowledgeable peers instead of nosy forum browsers like myself, who know little about the issues at hand.
RH, if you feel you have valid points against the research of BGF, WW, et al., wouldn’t it be better to present them to an audience of your peers?
I really don’t want any part of this imbroglio; just making a suggestion. I’ll shut up now.
Cheers,
WK
