mobile - desktop
3 months for $50.00
News & Events:
Posted by rayhoser on November 21, 2002 at 14:59:20:
In Reply to: Pseudechis and fantasies posted by WW on November 21, 2002 at 04:11:45:
That after four years of violent opposition by yourself, you finally concede that the snake I described in 1998 as pailsus pailsei is in fact different to "Pseudechis australis" as I originally stated and contrary to your widely disseminated claims, including those still on the EMBL sites?
Does this also mean that likewise you agree that I was correct in describing rossignilli as yet an other distinct species?
Does this also mean that you agree with my view that the the three Mulga Snake taxa I described last year are not sufficiently different from previously described forms to warrent separation at the species level?
Looking foreward to your belated concessions.