Does this mean?

Posted by rayhoser on November 21, 2002 at 14:59:20:

In Reply to: Pseudechis and fantasies posted by WW on November 21, 2002 at 04:11:45:

That after four years of violent opposition by yourself, you finally concede that the snake I described in 1998 as pailsus pailsei is in fact different to "Pseudechis australis" as I originally stated and contrary to your widely disseminated claims, including those still on the EMBL sites?
Does this also mean that likewise you agree that I was correct in describing rossignilli as yet an other distinct species?
Does this also mean that you agree with my view that the the three Mulga Snake taxa I described last year are not sufficiently different from previously described forms to warrent separation at the species level?
Looking foreward to your belated concessions.
Raymond Hoser

Follow Ups:

• Re: Does this mean? WW 11/22/02 (8)
  • Progress rayhoser 11/22/02 (7)
    • Re: Progress WW 11/22/02 (6)
      • More progress yet rayhoser 11/22/02 (5)
        • Errr... Ray? WW 11/23/02 (4)
          • The truth hurts you Wolgang rayhoser 11/23/02 (3)
            • Another sad truth rayhoser 11/23/02 (2)
              • Re: Another sad truth WW 11/23/02 (1)
                • Re: Another sad truth rayhoser 11/23/02 (0)

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ The Taxonomy Forum ]

KINGSNAKE.COM Enjoy all our content free of charge with a user account that gives you full access to every feature. For added visibility, paid options are available - post in our Classifieds, showcase your business with Banner Ads or a Directory listing, promote reptile events, and more. Quick Links Home Advertise Beta Classifieds Lost Password Your Account Community Blog Events Featured Articles Forums Photo Gallery Legal & Safety Terms of Service Classified TOS Age Verification Business Verification Vendor Complaint Support Banner Ad Help Classified Help Classified Tips Contact Us Forum Help Register for free ✓ Sign up! Kingsnake.com ® is a registered trademark © 1997-