mobile - desktop
Available Now at RodentPro.com!
News & Events:
Posted by rayhoser on November 22, 2002 at 23:54:39:
In Reply to: Re: Progress posted by WW on November 22, 2002 at 05:37:17:
Dear WW, It's a pity you and your alter egos were too busy getting stuck into me to be bothered reading the original descriptions. Diagnostic of BOTH pailsus were ventral and subcaudal counts.
Try reading the descriptions now (on the link below) before you and your mates claim "discovery" of this and other differences already singled out by myself.
But notwithstanding these argumentative defects from your side, I remain pleased that other independent (term used in limited context here) persons, to wit yourself and RM have found the same differences I did, thereby corroborating my original descriptions as correct and confirming the absence of "Pseudechis australis" from New Guinea among other things.
Please take this as a back-handed thank you.
ALL THE BEST