Pailsus rossignollii - info by R Mastenbrook.

Posted by Raymond Hoser on May 14, 2002 at 09:35:38:

In Reply to: Pseudechis australis (Pailsus rossignolii) some new info posted by Richard Mastenbroek on May 14, 2002 at 06:11:58:

Richard, your website was informative in more ways than one, and disregarding your childish digs at myself, provided some interesting data and good photos.
The facts speak for themselves and I remain happy with my original 2000 description of the new taxa.
I also eagerly await the description of that other "King Brown" alluded to in posts by David Williams from the PNG side, that he said he was in the process of describing in early 2001.
Thanks again for the posts.

Follow Ups:

• Re: Pailsus rossignollii - info by R Mastenbrook. Richard Mastenbroek 05/14/02 (16)
  • Validation of the species "rossignollii" Simon Stern 05/14/02 (1)
    • Re: Validation of the species "rossignollii" Richard Mastenbroek 05/15/02 (0)
  • Re: Pailsus rossignollii - info by R Mastenbrook. Raymond Hoser 05/14/02 (13)
    • Re: Pailsus rossignollii - info by R Mastenbrook. Richard Mastenbroek 05/15/02 (12)
      • Thanks Twice and more... Raymond Hoser 05/15/02 (11)
        • Ray and Richard. Scott Eipper 05/16/02 (10)
          • King Brown Male Punch ups Raymond Hoser 05/16/02 (9)
            • Re: King Brown Male Punch ups Richard Mastenbroek 05/16/02 (0)
            • Male size and combat WW 05/16/02 (7)
              • Agreed - No Post Raymond Hoser 05/17/02 (0)
              • Agreed... Jeremy 05/16/02 (2)
                • How could I forget... WW 05/16/02 (1)
                  • Hmmm??... Jeremy 05/16/02 (0)
              • Re: Male size and combat Richard Mastenbroek 05/16/02 (2)
                • Hello Richard, Derek K. 05/16/02 (1)
                  • Re: Hello Richard, Richard Mastenbroek 05/17/02 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: Richard, your website was informative in more ways than one, and disregarding your childish digs at myself, provided some interesting data and good photos. : The facts speak for themselves and I remain happy with my original 2000 description of the new taxa. : I also eagerly await the description of that other "King Brown" alluded to in posts by David Williams from the PNG side, that he said he was in the process of describing in early 2001. : Thanks again for the posts.

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Taxonomy Forum ]

KINGSNAKE.COM Enjoy all our content free of charge with a user account that gives you full access to every feature. For added visibility, paid options are available - post in our Classifieds, showcase your business with Banner Ads or a Directory listing, promote reptile events, and more. Quick Links Home Advertise Classifieds Lost Password Your Account Community Journals Events Featured Articles Forums Photo Gallery Legal & Safety Terms of Service Classified TOS Age Verification Business Verification Vendor Complaint Support Banner Ad Help Classified Help Classified Tips Contact Us Forum Help Register for free ✓ Sign up! Kingsnake.com ® is a registered trademark © 1997-