Taxonomy and others

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Taxonomy Forum ]

Posted by Raymond Hoser on February 26, 2002 at 06:46:47:

In Reply to: Australian Taxonomy? A joke and a frustration. posted by Scott Thomson on February 26, 2002 at 03:54:07:

Scott, thanks for your comments.
Many I agree with, some I don't and many others I agree with as generalizations with obvious exceptions.
The only thing that really disturbed me in your previous post was your statement of quitting herpetology, taxonomy or similar.
My advice (or desire) is don't.
We need more people dealing with herp, not less and your contributions to the field will be long recognised by myself and many others.
Changing the subject slightly, I had a conversation with Rob Sprackland recently which echoed one of your points (above).
He thought it odd that here in OZ, we had herpetologists who'd identify new taxa in papers and then fail to name it.
These "holes" are often what have been plugged by the likes of Wells/Wellington, Cann and myself. For what it's worth, may I say that in 50 years time no one will know who we were, but at least the taxa will carry proper names and not just be "sp".
All the best

Taxonomy papers and others

Follow Ups:

Re: Taxonomy and others Scott Thomson 02/26/02 (14)
- Re: Taxonomy and others Scott Eipper 02/27/02 (5)
  - Monitor Peer Review Q WW 02/27/02 (3)
    - Re: Monitor Peer Review Q Scott Eipper 02/28/02 (0)
    - Re: Monitor Peer Review Q Scott Thomson 02/27/02 (1)
      - Monitor Peer Review Q - how many reviewers Raymond Hoser 02/27/02 (0)
  - Maybe I should proof my posts..n/p Scott Eipper 02/27/02 (0)
- Papers, etc Raymond Hoser 02/26/02 (7)
  - Re: Papers, etc BGF 02/27/02 (1)
    - PS BGF 02/27/02 (0)
  - Re: Papers, etc Scott Thomson 02/26/02 (4)
    - Peer Review? - or censorship? Raymond Hoser 02/27/02 (3)
      - Re: Peer Review? - or censorship? Scott Thomson 02/27/02 (2)
        
        Agree 100% (more) WW 02/27/02 (1)
        
        Also Rare agreement 100% / no post Raymond Hoser 02/27/02 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: Scott, thanks for your comments. : Many I agree with, some I don't and many others I agree with as generalizations with obvious exceptions. : The only thing that really disturbed me in your previous post was your statement of quitting herpetology, taxonomy or similar. : My advice (or desire) is don't. : We need more people dealing with herp, not less and your contributions to the field will be long recognised by myself and many others. : Changing the subject slightly, I had a conversation with Rob Sprackland recently which echoed one of your points (above). : He thought it odd that here in OZ, we had herpetologists who'd identify new taxa in papers and then fail to name it. : These "holes" are often what have been plugged by the likes of Wells/Wellington, Cann and myself. For what it's worth, may I say that in 50 years time no one will know who we were, but at least the taxa will carry proper names and not just be "sp". : All the best

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Taxonomy Forum ]

KINGSNAKE.COM

Enjoy all our content free of charge with a user account that gives you full access to every feature. For added visibility, paid options are available - post in our Classifieds, showcase your business with Banner Ads or a Directory listing, promote reptile events, and more.

Taxonomy and others

KINGSNAKE.COM

Quick Links

Community

Legal & Safety

Support