Monitor Peer Review Q

Posted by WW on February 27, 2002 at 02:59:31:

In Reply to: Re: Taxonomy and others posted by Scott Eipper on February 27, 2002 at 00:10:57:

: Scott,

: Just a note on Monitor....It is now Peer Reviewed. The reviewer however is wishing to remain anon.

Scott,

Maybe I misunderstood you, but are you saying that there is only one peer reviewer for the entire journal, irrespective of subject matter?

Cheers,

Wolfgang

Follow Ups:

• Re: Monitor Peer Review Q Scott Eipper 02/28/02 (0)
• Re: Monitor Peer Review Q Scott Thomson 02/27/02 (1)
  • Monitor Peer Review Q - how many reviewers Raymond Hoser 02/27/02 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: : Scott, : : Just a note on Monitor....It is now Peer Reviewed. The reviewer however is wishing to remain anon. : Scott, : Maybe I misunderstood you, but are you saying that there is only one peer reviewer for the entire journal, irrespective of subject matter? : Cheers, : Wolfgang

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Taxonomy Forum ]

kingsnake.com | NRAAC.ORG | ReptileBusinessGuide.com | ReptileShowGuide.com | ReptileShows.mobi | Connected By Cars | DesertRunner.org AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine pool banner - advertise here advertise here advertise here kingsnake.com® is a registered trademark© 1997-     - this site optimized for 1024x768 resolution -