Re: PPS

Posted by WW on March 12, 2003 at 17:14:09:

In Reply to: PPS posted by BGF on March 12, 2003 at 14:50:34:

Hmmmmm...

Although I agree that LD50 doesn't mean squat ina case like that, and although I used to keep this species and not think twice about freehandling it, I have to say that the case of the paralysis experienced by the pet store guy,a nd ther permanent disfigurement ofan arm suffered by Foden after his bite kind of got my attention.

I would certainly not call it "harmless". Whether and how it should be legislated and regulated is another question - obviously, any large dog can do as much damage or more, and is more likely to do so to third parties. Do I feel it should be in the same regulatorry category as a black mamba? No. Do I feel that it shoud be sold freely as a harmles snake to any 14 year-old coming along with his pocket money? No.

Cheers,

Wolfgang

Follow Ups:

• Re: PPS BGF 03/12/03 (7)
  • Re: PPS paalexan 03/12/03 (6)
    • Re: PPS BGF 03/12/03 (5)
      • Re: PPS WW 03/13/03 (4)
        • Re: PPS BGF 03/13/03 (3)
          • Re: PPS WW 03/14/03 (2)
            • Re: PPS BGF 03/14/03 (0)
            • The problem with legislators . . . Trust 03/14/03 (0)

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ The Rear-Fanged Forum ]

KINGSNAKE.COM Enjoy all our content free of charge with a user account that gives you full access to every feature. For added visibility, paid options are available - post in our Classifieds, showcase your business with Banner Ads or a Directory listing, promote reptile events, and more. Quick Links Home Advertise Beta Classifieds Lost Password Your Account Community Blog Events Featured Articles Forums Photo Gallery Legal & Safety Terms of Service Classified TOS Age Verification Business Verification Vendor Complaint Support Banner Ad Help Classified Help Classified Tips Contact Us Forum Help Register for free ✓ Sign up! Kingsnake.com ® is a registered trademark © 1997-