Re: PPS

Posted by paalexan on March 12, 2003 at 21:02:30:

In Reply to: Re: PPS posted by BGF on March 12, 2003 at 17:36:11:

:Good point mate.

:Let me clarify: While they are technically venomous, from a practical/legislative point of veiw, I consider them to be non-venomous.

IMO, it's a mistake to endorse contradictory `truths' depending on context. Hydrodynastes is venomous... and it's venomous if you're a politician as well as if you're a scientist.

When dealing with practicality and legislation, venom isn't really the issue, danger is... so in practical/legislative contexts it makes more sense to address danger, rather than venom...

Patrick Alexander

Follow Ups:

• Re: PPS BGF 03/12/03 (5)
  • Re: PPS WW 03/13/03 (4)
    • Re: PPS BGF 03/13/03 (3)
      • Re: PPS WW 03/14/03 (2)
        • Re: PPS BGF 03/14/03 (0)
        • The problem with legislators . . . Trust 03/14/03 (0)

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ The Rear-Fanged Forum ]

kingsnake.com | NRAAC.ORG | ReptileBusinessGuide.com | ReptileShowGuide.com | ReptileShows.mobi | Connected By Cars | DesertRunner.org AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine pool banner - advertise here advertise here advertise here kingsnake.com® is a registered trademark© 1997-     - this site optimized for 1024x768 resolution -