![]() | mobile - desktop |
![]() |
![]() Contact Sales! |
News & Events:
|
Posted by Mike on December 25, 1999 at 23:46:29:
In Reply to: Well. i geuss until they are Thamnophis rufodorsata we can still call them ratsnakes seing as that's what they are classified as now.................n/p posted by dd on December 25, 1999 at 19:14:20:
Boy, what's with the major attitudes around hear? You guys didn't get what you wanted for Christmas?
I have some jr. high aged nephews that are ignorant smart asses like some of you guys.(probably the same age too)A couple people share their views and opinions and you guys get all childish like some one insulted you or something. Anything I shared came from the ratsnake books I've read that emphatically say these snakes should not be ratsnakes. I didn't say we can't call them ratsnakes; I was just agreeing with Joey when he said most experts say they aren't ratsnakes.
Congrats to Phil and to Terry Cox for giving adult educated responses. Keep up the good work guys!
Subject:
Comments:
Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
|
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
| ||||||||