Scientific names and Irian Jaya carpets

Posted by Steno on March 06, 2002 at 02:23:04:

I have read every post and article on line (Hoser’s) I found about the difference between the so-called Irian Jaya carpets and the mainland (Australian) ones, but still I have not understand if it’s a merely case of “nomenclatur synonymizing (?)” or there are really different populations of pythons each different in patterns, color and distibution from the others that are likely to be referred as “variegata”, “harrisoni” or “macropsila”. It seems that the latter name is no longer used but in older pubblication as in Ross&Marzec (1990) and others, but what about tha “variegata” form that Barker&Barker (1994) describe in the Australian mainland and O’Shea (1996) refers as endemic of PNG? Like other taxa widely distribuited in the Australasian area (Liasis fuscus, the olives-group, the Amethisthina-complex and so on) I think that a sort of partition between more diverse taxa is a valid solution that takes account of the different locality/pattern evolution from the same ancestor. What do you think about it?

Cheers

Steno

Follow Ups:

• getting in first! Raymond Hoser 03/07/02 (1)
  • Re: getting in first! Scott Thomson 03/07/02 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: I have read every post and article on line (Hoser’s) I found about the difference between the so-called Irian Jaya carpets and the mainland (Australian) ones, but still I have not understand if it’s a merely case of “nomenclatur synonymizing (?)” or there are really different populations of pythons each different in patterns, color and distibution from the others that are likely to be referred as “variegata”, “harrisoni” or “macropsila”. It seems that the latter name is no longer used but in older pubblication as in Ross&Marzec (1990) and others, but what about tha “variegata” form that Barker&Barker (1994) describe in the Australian mainland and O’Shea (1996) refers as endemic of PNG? Like other taxa widely distribuited in the Australasian area (Liasis fuscus, the olives-group, the Amethisthina-complex and so on) I think that a sort of partition between more diverse taxa is a valid solution that takes account of the different locality/pattern evolution from the same ancestor. What do you think about it? : Cheers : Steno

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Taxonomy Forum ]

KINGSNAKE.COM Enjoy all our content free of charge with a user account that gives you full access to every feature. For added visibility, paid options are available - post in our Classifieds, showcase your business with Banner Ads or a Directory listing, promote reptile events, and more. Quick Links Home Advertise Beta Classifieds Lost Password Your Account Community Blog Events Featured Articles Forums Photo Gallery Legal & Safety Terms of Service Classified TOS Age Verification Business Verification Vendor Complaint Support Banner Ad Help Classified Help Classified Tips Contact Us Forum Help Register for free ✓ Sign up! Kingsnake.com ® is a registered trademark © 1997-