Re: Sorry Wolfgang...

Posted by Scott Eipper on November 16, 2002 at 04:06:56:

In Reply to: Re: Sorry Wolfgang... posted by WW on October 31, 2002 at 05:38:40:

Wolfgang,

I am interested to know which ones are fantasy and which are correct?

If possible can you send me either a hard copy of the paper or an electronic version when its published?

Not trying to further a debate between you and Ray....I have my own preceptions on what is different and in my mind the true Mulga Snakes....Cannia australis...(they are not that similar to Pseudechis porphyriacus to In my mind to be in the same genus) need to have a number of forms ressurected from the past...the Darwins "models" that were described as "Naja australis" are not the same as the ones from the Eyre Peninsula in the South.

Regards,

Scott Eipper

Follow Ups:

• Pseudechis and fantasies WW 11/21/02 (10)
  • Does this mean? rayhoser 11/21/02 (9)
    • Re: Does this mean? WW 11/22/02 (8)
      • Progress rayhoser 11/22/02 (7)
        • Re: Progress WW 11/22/02 (6)
          • More progress yet rayhoser 11/22/02 (5)
            • Errr... Ray? WW 11/23/02 (4)
              • The truth hurts you Wolgang rayhoser 11/23/02 (3)
                • Another sad truth rayhoser 11/23/02 (2)
                  • Re: Another sad truth WW 11/23/02 (1)
                    • Re: Another sad truth rayhoser 11/23/02 (0)

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ The Taxonomy Forum ]

kingsnake.com | NRAAC.ORG | ReptileBusinessGuide.com | ReptileShowGuide.com | ReptileShows.mobi | Connected By Cars | DesertRunner.org AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine pool banner - advertise here advertise here advertise here kingsnake.com® is a registered trademark© 1997-     - this site optimized for 1024x768 resolution -