mobile - desktop
3 months for $50.00
News & Events:
Posted by Wulf Schleip on March 08, 2002 at 13:21:26:
In Reply to: Please explain? posted by Raymond Hoser on March 05, 2002 at 03:45:24:
wow, after beeing off the net for a week now seeing the mess !
Well, I didn't want to offend you anyway !
After reading the ICZN code (4) again and again and reading the other postings I have to admit that I obviously didn't
do my "homework" properly.
I hope you'll accept my apology.
P.S.: To all those on this forum posting to this thread.
Thanks for not tearing my apart :-)
: Wulf, you just said
: "As I understand the new taxa do not agree with the ICZN rules".
: That's not my understanding of things, but here's your chance to give direct reference to the ICZN rule I have allegedly breached which would make my taxa names invalid.
: I have my copy of the rules in front of me and based on your post, assume you have a copy of them in front of you as well, and am looking at it (the rules) with anticipation, especially as almost everyone here on the coalface in Australia are already using the names, bearing in mind even my adversaries have grudgingly admitted on KS already that my names are validly assigned.
: ALL THE BEST