 | market - home |
|
| market - home |
|
 |
 |
News & Events:
|
Posted by Sharleen on February 17, 2000 at 08:23:12:
In Reply to: Re: This remedy posted by John Clare on February 17, 2000 at 07:24:35:
No problem with poison semantics (I suppose to like poisons ;-), I was first an ecotoxicologist (not because I want to poison my husband or my little brother!!!!!!), before going in the wrong way: genetics!!!!!!!! :-P. No, it's better :*). For heavy metals, they like membranes (cell membranes), also fat bodies, mother's milk, neural cells (etc) and will always stay in the body because they stay habitually in the hepatho-enteric pathway (I mean, absorb by intestines, go in the big "circulation", then to the liver, excrete by the liver, return to intestines ......). Fatter your tiger is and more it will absorb heavy metals!
But Clout burns skins in few minutes and the water is full of skin flakes, after only 20 minutes of exposure. I supposed that it had no effect on tapeworms, but work with some skin infections (not all). In fact, I prefer to not recommend it to someone, because the product really stress my waterdog (which is now better than when I removed it from Clout solution). Then if someone has good result with Complete remedy, tell it to me.
Sharleen.
: I tend to segregate things into things that will "poison" you and things that will directly hurt you. I know it's really semantics, but sodium chlorite exposure could burn you,
: but you won't die or suffer lasting effects from it. Something like a heavy metal will slowly poison and lead to long term effects. That's why I reckon this complete remedy
: thing is a nice idea.
: I have a question for Aaron though - what problems is it prescribed for?
: John
: : I want to know if the product is good, because I have experiment the same with my waterdog (with the tapeworm) and I was using "Clout". But "Clout" is toxic (more than your product, I think). If it is work, I will use it next time.
: : Sharleen
