Re: Very Serious Flaws With Proposed Guidelines

Posted by Brett on November 09, 1998 at 21:23:08:

In Reply to: Very Serious Flaws With Proposed Guidelines posted by Dave Beamer on November 09, 1998 at 16:09:34:

Dave, lighten up. I know at least two of the TAC committee support the use of subspecies in regulation. I will wager that all (or almost all) of them do. Despite your (and other people's) views on subspecies there are good reasons for subspecies in some instances. You don't need to be told why they are helpful in regulation. It is inherently obvious. I read your comments as "these suggestions suck, go do something useful". I would suggest that you add to/articulate changes to the proposed rule rather than criticize. Certainly what is written is NOT a final draft. It will be translated into legalese and revised and updated a number of times before NRAAC puts an official endorsement behind it. Unfortunately I would tend to agree that restrictions on endangered threatened will need to be changed. It makes sense to me to allow legally acquired (out of state) threatened/endangered to be captive produced. It will come along with time. Your help would be appreciated, but if you have nothing constructive to say, please hold your tongue.

Follow Ups:

• Re: Very Serious Flaws With Proposed Guidelines Dave Beamer 11/09/98 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: Dave, lighten up. I know at least two of the TAC committee support the use of subspecies in regulation. I will wager that all (or almost all) of them do. Despite your (and other people's) views on subspecies there are good reasons for subspecies in some instances. You don't need to be told why they are helpful in regulation. It is inherently obvious. I read your comments as "these suggestions suck, go do something useful". I would suggest that you add to/articulate changes to the proposed rule rather than criticize. Certainly what is written is NOT a final draft. It will be translated into legalese and revised and updated a number of times before NRAAC puts an official endorsement behind it. Unfortunately I would tend to agree that restrictions on endangered threatened will need to be changed. It makes sense to me to allow legally acquired (out of state) threatened/endangered to be captive produced. It will come along with time. Your help would be appreciated, but if you have nothing constructive to say, please hold your tongue.

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Herp Law Forum ] [ FAQ ]

KINGSNAKE.COM Enjoy all our content free of charge with a user account that gives you full access to every feature. For added visibility, paid options are available - post in our Classifieds, showcase your business with Banner Ads or a Directory listing, promote reptile events, and more. Quick Links Home Advertise Classifieds Lost Password Your Account Community Journals Events Featured Articles Forums Photo Gallery Legal & Safety Terms of Service Classified TOS Age Verification Business Verification Vendor Complaint Support Banner Ad Help Classified Help Classified Tips Contact Us Forum Help Register for free ✓ Sign up! Kingsnake.com ® is a registered trademark © 1997-