Milks vs. corns vs. kings

Posted by JDM on April 23, 2003 at 18:48:47:

In Reply to: Milks vs. corns vs. kings posted by walkerman on April 21, 2003 at 16:23:10:

I have kept and bred all three. The milks are neat, they are pretty... but usually seem to be jumpy. Kings (in my opinion) are easy to breed (there are some species that are more difficult than others) and are the most interesting to me. Corns are also pretty, but not as much as milks and kings (in my opinion). Corns are definitely the easiest to breed, with double clutches and breedings without hibernation not unusual. They are normally easy to get the hatchlings to feed and have large clutches (up to 30 seems to be the norm for me). I would say just go ahead and keep all three. If you are looking to breed quantity, definitely do corns. If you are looking for more interesting captives, keep the kings or milks. As always, there are many subspecies of milks and kings and some of them are just as easy to breed and work with as corns, while others are much much more difficult.

Follow Ups:

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ The Milk Snake Forum ]

KINGSNAKE.COM Enjoy all our content free of charge with a user account that gives you full access to every feature. For added visibility, paid options are available - post in our Classifieds, showcase your business with Banner Ads or a Directory listing, promote reptile events, and more. Quick Links Home Advertise Beta Classifieds Lost Password Your Account Community Blog Events Featured Articles Forums Photo Gallery Legal & Safety Terms of Service Classified TOS Age Verification Business Verification Vendor Complaint Support Banner Ad Help Classified Help Classified Tips Contact Us Forum Help Register for free ✓ Sign up! Kingsnake.com ® is a registered trademark © 1997-