Re: Yes, I saw it before..don't be to sure about iguanas.....

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Iguana Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by m chambers on June 22, 2001 at 10:39:15:

In Reply to: Yes, I saw it before posted by Samcin on June 22, 2001 at 04:20:27:

I'm not getting into it again with the bleeding heart igauna lovers on this forum, but didn't I say that this stuff was going to happen ? The interesting thing is to see how many of these people will go to bat on the proposed law. N.Y. now.....the other cities/states later ! Like I said before....ANY non-common ( defintition of non-common: the adverse of common, a smaller percentage as common, not ordinary )animal kept as pets can be perceived as DANGEROUS( definition of dangerous: hazardous,perilous, able or likely to inflict injury ). It is strange though that as a recipient of numerous secondary bacterial infections of hamsters, rats, mice etc, bites that these little critters wouldn't be included as dangerous in the proposed law. Maybe has to do with the cute little furry noses that these animals have ?
Forget it ! I'm not going into a arguable, flammable, debatable situation again with you all ! LOL !

M Chambers

: It was not clear whether it included iguanas. I only saw monitors on the banned list. It is similar to an exotic bill that has passed in several states and iguanas is not on the list of dangerous pets. They are going after lions, tigers and bears, etc and making owners carry insurance.

Follow Ups:

Defining dangerous.... Shalaney 06/23/01 (1)
- Re: Defining dangerous....short and sweet ...it's not my fight..more.... m chambers 06/23/01 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: I'm not getting into it again with the bleeding heart igauna lovers on this forum, but didn't I say that this stuff was going to happen ? The interesting thing is to see how many of these people will go to bat on the proposed law. N.Y. now.....the other cities/states later ! Like I said before....ANY non-common ( defintition of non-common: the adverse of common, a smaller percentage as common, not ordinary )animal kept as pets can be perceived as DANGEROUS( definition of dangerous: hazardous,perilous, able or likely to inflict injury ). It is strange though that as a recipient of numerous secondary bacterial infections of hamsters, rats, mice etc, bites that these little critters wouldn't be included as dangerous in the proposed law. Maybe has to do with the cute little furry noses that these animals have ? : Forget it ! I'm not going into a arguable, flammable, debatable situation again with you all ! LOL ! : M Chambers : : It was not clear whether it included iguanas. I only saw monitors on the banned list. It is similar to an exotic bill that has passed in several states and iguanas is not on the list of dangerous pets. They are going after lions, tigers and bears, etc and making owners carry insurance.

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Iguana Forum ] [ FAQ ]