but......

Posted by kerry on January 07, 2002 at 23:04:04:

In Reply to: Re: Sub-specific designation in Gila Monsters...... posted by Jackie Lapradd on January 07, 2002 at 17:14:56:

......like I've said before, as far as captive breeding populations and the mixing of bloodlines then yes, I'm with you... call them whatever you want, or whatever you can get away with. I would much rather they all just be called "Gila Monsters" with no sub-specific designation and rated or judged on a scale of 1 to 10 with value being determined by beauty rather than subspecies.

How does that sound... like a good place for "common ground"???

Follow Ups:

• Re: but...... Jackie Lapradd 01/08/02 (0)
• Kerry, I do agree with you on this one!....... Ken 01/07/02 (1)
  • You guys must have been reading my mind...... kerry 01/08/02 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: ......like I've said before, as far as captive breeding populations and the mixing of bloodlines then yes, I'm with you... call them whatever you want, or whatever you can get away with. I would much rather they all just be called "Gila Monsters" with no sub-specific designation and rated or judged on a scale of 1 to 10 with value being determined by beauty rather than subspecies. : How does that sound... like a good place for "common ground"???

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Heloderma Forum ]

kingsnake.com | NRAAC.ORG | ReptileBusinessGuide.com | ReptileShowGuide.com | ReptileShows.mobi | Connected By Cars | DesertRunner.org AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine pool banner - advertise here $50 year pool banner - $30 year pool banner - $25 year kingsnake.com® is a registered trademark© 1997- 2025     - this site optimized for 1024x768 resolution -