![]() | mobile - desktop |
|
![]() |
![]() 3 months for $50.00 |
News & Events:
|
Posted by PatrickV on April 15, 2001 at 23:59:15:
In Reply to: why cedar but not cypress? posted by monkey on April 13, 2001 at 17:41:15:
: Could someone please explain to me why cypress (mulch, at least) isn't considered toxic to reptiles while the closely related cedar is? I'm assuming the toxicity comes from quinones, tropolones and podophyllotoxin found in the woods. is it simply a matter of the levels found within the various species?
: or have i missed it completely?
: are false cedars considered toxic or non-toxic?
: confused, monkey
Subject:
Comments:
Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|