Re: WW You Missed your vocation

Posted by WW on March 08, 2002 at 03:49:10:

In Reply to: WW You Missed your vocation posted by Raymond Hoser on March 07, 2002 at 16:04:09:

: You've read the original paper and know
: that I looked at many specimens, not just one.

There is no evidence whatsoever in the paper that you yourself looked at a single specimen.

If you had done, you might at least have supplied a holotype that you had actually looked at, and thus supplied us with such trivia as the sex of the specimen and the number of ventrals and dorsals.

You mention various specimens in European live collections - and yet can only cite an e-mail or a letter from Weitzel to discuss the behaviour of the critter - if you saw them yourself, why not discuss your own experience? You certainly told us plenty about your own dealings with the specimens concerned in your P. pailsei description.

And why didn't you take your own photos of all these specimens you looked at, instead of relying on Klaus Roemer's and Marra's? You are a good photographer (credit where credit is due), and I find it hard to believe that you would visit all these collections and examine all those snakes without taking a single shot of any of them.

If you can prove me wrong, then good for you, and my apologies, but until I see the evidence, I will stick to what seems like the more parsimonious explanation to me.

Cheers,

Wolfgang

Follow Ups:

• Vindicated - WW You Missed your vocation Raymond Hoser 03/08/02 (2)
  • Then repost the info. WW 03/08/02 (1)
    • Going bush>> Jerry Feldner 03/09/02 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: : You've read the original paper and know : : that I looked at many specimens, not just one. : There is no evidence whatsoever in the paper that you yourself looked at a single specimen. : If you had done, you might at least have supplied a holotype that you had actually looked at, and thus supplied us with such trivia as the sex of the specimen and the number of ventrals and dorsals. : You mention various specimens in European live collections - and yet can only cite an e-mail or a letter from Weitzel to discuss the behaviour of the critter - if you saw them yourself, why not discuss your own experience? You certainly told us plenty about your own dealings with the specimens concerned in your P. pailsei description. : And why didn't you take your own photos of all these specimens you looked at, instead of relying on Klaus Roemer's and Marra's? You are a good photographer (credit where credit is due), and I find it hard to believe that you would visit all these collections and examine all those snakes without taking a single shot of any of them. : If you can prove me wrong, then good for you, and my apologies, but until I see the evidence, I will stick to what seems like the more parsimonious explanation to me. : Cheers, : Wolfgang

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Taxonomy Forum ]

KINGSNAKE.COM Enjoy all our content free of charge with a user account that gives you full access to every feature. For added visibility, paid options are available - post in our Classifieds, showcase your business with Banner Ads or a Directory listing, promote reptile events, and more. Quick Links Home Advertise Classifieds Lost Password Your Account Community Journals Events Featured Articles Forums Photo Gallery Legal & Safety Terms of Service Classified TOS Age Verification Business Verification Vendor Complaint Support Banner Ad Help Classified Help Classified Tips Contact Us Forum Help Register for free ✓ Sign up! Kingsnake.com ® is a registered trademark © 1997-