kingsnake.com - reptile and amphibian classifieds, breeders, forums, photos, videos and more

return to main index

  mobile - desktop
follow us on facebook follow us on twitter follow us on YouTube link to us on LinkedIn
 
click here for Rodent Pro
Mice, Rats, Rabbits, Chicks, Quail
Available Now at RodentPro.com!
Locate a business by name: click to list your business
search the classifieds. buy an account
events by zip code list an event
Search the forums             Search in:
News & Events: Herp Photo of the Day: Happy Rattlesnake Friday! . . . . . . . . . .  Herp Photo of the Day: Vine Snake . . . . . . . . . .  St. Louis Herpetological Society - May 11, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Colorado Herp Society Meeting - May 17, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Chicago Herpetological Society Meeting - May 18, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  San Diego Herp Society Meeting - May 20, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Bay Area Herpetological Society Meeting - May 23, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Suncoast Herp Society Meeting - May 24, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  DFW Herp Society Meeting - May 24, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Tucson Herpetological Society Meeting - May 26, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Greater Cincinnati Herp Society Meeting - June 04, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Calusa Herp Society Meeting - June 05, 2025 . . . . . . . . . . 

Re: Assumptions, definitions and generalizations


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Taxonomy Forum ]

Posted by emoneill on December 14, 2002 at 13:26:03:

In Reply to: Re: Assumptions, definitions and generalizations posted by Kenny Wray on December 11, 2002 at 17:39:23:

Sounds like we are not too far off in our beliefs. I was not making a crack at YOU about "not knowing the first thing" about various topics. Maybe that was an overstatement about others though. Keep on questioning scientists. I think we should be able to explain our work. I hate clones.

I like the idea that you and others are making a case for subspecies. Of course I would be wrong if I said that there are not regional variants of ratsnakes in NA, and recent papers like Burbrink's leave these to be explained. But I am not yet convinced that we need to call them subspecies. As you probably know some are calling these variants "pattern classes" (Grismer 2002). Would you say this is the same as what you would call a subspecies?

Cheers




Follow Ups:




[ Follow Ups ] [ The Taxonomy Forum ]