>By the way emoneill and pjay, here is a perfect example of what we were discussing below. How many people are going to waste there time and publish a paper refuting these "new proposed" names?
Tough question to answer, let me get my crystal ball. Only time will tell. Maybe none. But since you can choose not to use his taxonomy then I guess there is no reason to. (Yes, I acknowledge that you were right about this.) But If no one does reply what is to prevent people from using his taxonomy? (this is a serious question) or are you okay with that?