kingsnake.com - reptile and amphibian classifieds, breeders, forums, photos, videos and more
return to main index
follow us on facebook follow us on twitter follow us on YouTube link to us on LinkedIn
 
click here for Reptile SuperShow
Professional Cages & Rack Systems
Made in the USA - Freedom Breeder
Locate a business by name: click to list your business
search the classifieds. buy an account
events by zip code list an event
Search the forums             Search in:
News & Events: Herp Photo of the Day: Happy Rattlesnake Friday! . . . . . . . . . .  Colorado Herp Society Meeting - Feb. 20, 2018 . . . . . . . . . .  ReptiCon Tampa - Feb. 24-25, 2018 . . . . . . . . . .  ReptiCon Memphis - Feb. 24-25, 2018 . . . . . . . . . .  Hamburg Reptile Show - Feb. 24, 2018 . . . . . . . . . .  Western Maryland Reptile Show - Mar. 03, 2018 . . . . . . . . . .  Jacksonville Herp Society Meeting - Mar. 03, 2018 . . . . . . . . . .  Greater Cincinnati Herp Society Meeting - Mar. 07, 2018 . . . . . . . . . .  ReptiCon Jacksonville - Mar. 10-11, 2018 . . . . . . . . . .  ReptiCon Denver - Mar. 10-11, 2018 . . . . . . . . . .  All Maryland Reptile Show - Mar. 10, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . 

hmmm


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Taxonomy Forum ]

Posted by troy h on October 16, 2002 at 17:13:40:

In Reply to: Re: posted by pjay on October 15, 2002 at 14:31:35:

: changes that have recently occurred in the major and more importantly regional and obscure journals that would have otherwise gone unnoticed.

in other words, these were published in out of the way journals with more lax editorial requirements . . . often is the case.

:not accepting a "hypothesis" that is accompanied by data in a valid publication is not a good enough reason not to use the new names.

it depends on the data, doesn't it? i've seen pubs in J. Herp. where i wondered how in the hell it slipped past the editors, because the data, results, and conclusions were internally inconsistent.

:ignoring valid taxonomic changes is only going to cause more problems. if you feel that the change is unwarranted, then you should write a paper that refutes the change and returns the name to the old taxonomy.

again, just because a hypothesis has been presented, doesn't make it valid. we don't force paleontologists to accept the hypothesis that all dinosaurs were warm-blooded, do we? no, we present more data!

: the use of multiple accepted names would not serve the purpose that taxonomists strive for: unambiguous identification of a unique taxon with a unique name.

in my years of training as a systematist (MS+) i was under the impression that the main thing to strive for was to uncover the real evolutionary history of an organism.

and anyway, you're missing my point, i think. i'm not arguing for multiple accepted names, i'm just saying that because a name has been changed recently (often in some obscure paper) doesn't mean that one has to accept that name change. in fact, i'm saying that each name change should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, and that the data itself ought to be evaluated. of course, it goes without saying that a researcher ought to point out where he is being "conservative" and maintaining use of an older name, and state why.

troy




Follow Ups:




[ Follow Ups ] [ The Taxonomy Forum ]