 | mobile - desktop |
|
| mobile - desktop |
|
 |
 Contact Sales! |
News & Events:
|
Posted by Wildcrotalus on October 21, 2002 at 03:36:34:
In Reply to: Not total ban posted by Samcin on October 20, 2002 at 07:52:49:
So their theory behind this is what? That the animals cannot and will not attack or pose a danger is kept as you post below? Heh, first time the undertrained, underpaid worker at a shelter (and by no means am I saying that they all are but you have one in every crowd) gets mauled by Tigger and Pooh is not around to stop it then, these too, shall be banned. Dave B
::This doesn't ban them all together. It allows them in sanctuaries and incorporated humane shelters. If you have the land, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to be a 501C3 agency.
:And yes, I have done it.
:Agree that this is a bill to watch. It could very well have amendments which add animals.
